Authors: Shenaz Ahmed BSc (Hons) PhD,* Louise Bryant BSc (Hons) PhD and Jenny Hewison BSc (Hons) PhD
Objectives The Antenatal Screening Web Resource (AnSWeR) was
designed to support informed prenatal testing choices by providing
balanced information about disability, based on the testimonies of
disabled people and their families. We were commissioned by the
developers to independently evaluate the website. This paper
focused on how participants evaluated AnSWeR in terms of
providing balanced information.
Setting West Yorkshire.
Participants A total of 69 people were drawn from three groups:
health professionals, people with personal experience of tested-for
conditions (Downs syndrome, cystic fibrosis and spina bifida) and
people representing potential users of the resource.
Method Data were collected via focus groups and electronic questionnaires.
Results Participants believed that information about the experience
of living with the tested-for conditions and terminating a pregnancy
for the conditions were important to support informed antenatal
testing and termination decisions. However, there were differences in
opinion about whether the information about the tested-for conditions
was balanced or not. Some people felt that the inclusion of
photographs of people with the tested-for conditions introduced
biases (both positive and negative). Many participants were also of
the opinion that AnSWeR presented insufficient information on
termination of an affected pregnancy to support informed choice.
Conclusion This study highlighted the difficulty of designing balanced
information about tested-for conditions and a lack of
methodology for doing so. It is suggested that AnSWeR currently
provides a counterbalance to other websites that focus on the
medical aspects of disability. Its aim to provide balanced information
would be aided by increasing the number and range of case
studies available on the website.